accepts that it hurts less.
I'm done with the gaslighting and trolling. Much less posting non-msi related content. Both of which are very much against the rules.
I'd suggest not coming back in 30, but knowing your kind the way I do, you will. For a day......
Lastly, so you show a picture of an Asus board running at 4000 MHz.....Guess what?
https://www.eteknix.com/corsair-vengeance-memory-hits-5000-mhz-on-amd-ryzen-cpus/
Gee....why can the MSI board hit 5000 but the Asus board can't? Maybe Asus's boards just aren't up to the task.....
Then there's :
with an X570 Tomahawk at 5000 MHz. An actual user doing it himself.
I can cherry pick examples to show you something that doesn't fit your argument too, like tons of users that are unable to go past 3200 MHz for various reasons right now.
But here's the thing, it does fit what we've been saying. We've been constantly saying that the memory speed is highly dependent on the CPU's IMC and the quality of it, not the motherboard (as you've constantly suggested, and I've disproven with the link showing an MSI board MUCH faster than that Asus pic you're showing.....). Some CPU's will be of much better quality and will gladly clock much higher than others that are of a lower quality. If EVERY SINGLE CPU that AMD produced could hit speeds higher than 3200 MHz, don't you think AMD would guarantee speeds that are much higher? Just to show up Intel? I certainly would......it would easily be bragging rights. But that's just it. They CAN'T guarantee every CPU can, and that's why the specs for the latest generation of Ryzen chips are only 3200 MHz. Otherwise they'd have darn near every computer builder doing an RMA on their CPU's that can hit faster than 3200 MHz. And it would be valid and legal because it couldn't hit the advertised speeds.
We can't help your lack of understanding of the problem. It's clear you're 1 of 2 things, 1. an idiot, or 2. a troll. I'm going with #2. And if I see this happening again with you in 30 days, I'll make it permanent.
