MPG X870E CARBON WIFI Beta BIOS

[Svet]

Spoiler: Older Versions

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A1E <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A1H <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A21 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A22 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A24 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A25 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A26 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A28 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A29 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A31 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A32 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A33 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A34 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A41 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A44 <<<

Notes:

• * Unstable RAM OC
• * Hang 0D when saving BIOS settings or doing M-Flash

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A62 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A65 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A66 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A93 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A99 <<<

.rar SHA-256: 0da3ebedfa9e1f53f3e3aa320c1fd32f770cae0b32f112fe87750f1f88031487
BIOS SHA-256: 07a227bb302e9eac43bca0e18a43cfe58e043302eebfb13b08c7b8653a8ad636

 

[lysyn12155d02d4]

Maybe there is a newer version of the BIOS available than 7E49AMSI.1A1G.

 

[Svet]

Updated with the latest version.

 

[CGHoll]

Updated with the latest version.

Would you happen to know of the changes/improvements that were made?

 

[Svet]

Updated with the latest version.

Would you happen to know of the changes/improvements that were made?

We can't provide such details.

 

[Svet]

Updated.

 

[Mr.Fox]

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A22 <<<

Thanks for posting the updates. This fixed the broken Per CCD core ratio overclocking. The core ratios are running at the multipliers set now and not 43.00 on all cores.

 

[Mr.Fox]

Thanks for posting the updates. This fixed the broken Per CCD core ratio overclocking. The core ratios are running at the multipliers set now and not 43.00 on all cores.

Hi @Svet just wanted to report a random bug I see with this 1A22 BIOS. Sometimes the UEFI display output during POST and in the BIOS is corrupted. Rebooting usually straightens it out. The scaling and wallpaper in the BIOS gets all messed up and text is fuzzy/blurry when it occurs and it remains until reaching the Windows desktop. Here is a screenshot example.

 

[danvisinic153902d9]

Hi salute @Svet here @Tatili from Romania, please note from Here another Severe MSI thread, which is not kinda Severe one Tomahawk ~jokeing~jokeing
Pls can you open another clean MSIx870 Tomahawk thread for us, which wanna keep it kinda crystal clear for more needed further infos and stuff ...
Thx in advance, ciao grazie

 

[RobsonByte]

With BIOS version 1A22 I get I/O errors on the 5GB network card if I disable the onboard sound card and it makes a mess with my PBO settings. Example: one of the cores runs with CO -11 with the sound card disabled and if I activate the sound card I have to raise the CO to +1 to be stable.

 

[Mr.Fox]

That sound like quite a mess @RobsonByte and it's weird that those would affect the CO values. I can't think of a good reason those should be related electrically. If I had to take a wild guess it is something they goofed up in the firmware itself.

 

[RobsonByte]

That sound like quite a mess @RobsonByte and it's weird that those would affect the CO values. I can't think of a good reason those should be related electrically. If I had to take a wild guess it is something they goofed up in the firmware itself.

For me, every day that passes it becomes clearer that it is a BIOS programming problem. Because in version 1A23 many people are having problems that did not exist before. In my case it was the worst version I have ever tested, because the Motherboard became totally unstable to the point of freezing regardless of the settings I make, there is nothing that makes it stable, usable.

 

[Mr.Fox]

Sorry to hear you're having issues like that as well as others that are. I returned the X870E Carbon for a refund and an X870E Taichi before the Carbon. Both had design defect issues. The Carbon's issues all seem to be firmware bugs. The Taichi issues were illogical allocation of PCIe lanes that limited functionality and higher memory latency.

I am using an X670E Gene until I am able to acquire an X870E Apex.

 

[RobsonByte]

Sorry to hear you're having issues like that as well as others that are. I returned the X870E Carbon for a refund and an X870E Taichi before the Carbon. Both had design defect issues. The Carbon's issues all seem to be firmware bugs. The Taichi issues were illogical allocation of PCIe lanes that limited functionality and higher memory latency.

I am using an X670E Gene until I am able to acquire an X870E Apex.

Apex is a good option, but today I saw news about PCI problems: it's literally breaking GPUs. The world of technology is living in dark days.

 

[Mr.Fox]

Apex is a good option, but today I saw news about PCI problems: it's literally breaking GPUs. The world of technology is living in dark days.

Thanks for saying something. I have not seen that so I will have to look for it. The Apex is still under development so hopefully it will be resolved before they go into production.

 

[Mr.Fox]

Apex is a good option, but today I saw news about PCI problems: it's literally breaking GPUs. The world of technology is living in dark days.

Thanks for saying something. I have not seen that so I will have to look for it. The Apex is still under development so hopefully it will be resolved before they go into production.

Is this what you are referring to, or something more catastrophic?

ASUS PCIe Slot Q-Release Slim mechanism may scratch your GPU, first RTX 5090 affected - VideoCardz.com

ASUS 800-series motherboard quick GPU release mechanism reportedly damaging PCIe interfaces ASUS is facing criticism following reports of GPU damage

videocardz.com

Reports Suggest ASUS Quick Release System Inflicting Physical Damage on GPU PCIe Interfaces

HXL/9550pro and HardwareLuxx's Andreas Schilling shared evidence of the ASUS PCIe Q-Release Slim—the manufacturer's latest ejection mechanism—causing damage to graphics card PCIe connectors. Recent feedback suggests that repeated usage can scrape or grind off material present on a card's...

www.techpowerup.com

Asus' Q-Release Slim is reportedly damaging some GPU PCIe connectors

Affects 800-series Intel and AMD motherboards.

www.tomshardware.com

 

[RobsonByte]

Is this what you are referring to, or something more catastrophic?

ASUS PCIe Slot Q-Release Slim mechanism may scratch your GPU, first RTX 5090 affected - VideoCardz.com

ASUS 800-series motherboard quick GPU release mechanism reportedly damaging PCIe interfaces ASUS is facing criticism following reports of GPU damage

videocardz.com

Reports Suggest ASUS Quick Release System Inflicting Physical Damage on GPU PCIe Interfaces

HXL/9550pro and HardwareLuxx's Andreas Schilling shared evidence of the ASUS PCIe Q-Release Slim—the manufacturer's latest ejection mechanism—causing damage to graphics card PCIe connectors. Recent feedback suggests that repeated usage can scrape or grind off material present on a card's...

www.techpowerup.com

Asus' Q-Release Slim is reportedly damaging some GPU PCIe connectors

Affects 800-series Intel and AMD motherboards.

www.tomshardware.com

Exactly that. Physical damage on PCI Slot Q-release.

 

[Mr.Fox]

Yeah, that's definitely not ideal. I wouldn't call it "breaking" GPUs but, best case scenario, causing physical damage like that is undesirable and unaesthetic. If a person took their GPU in and out of the slot on a frequent basis it could hurt the resale value of the GPU or void its warranty with the GPU manufacturer having it all scratched up like that. What would be humorous is if the motherboard and GPU are both made by ASUS and they end up having to foot the bill for replacing both. I'd still buy the Apex though. My 4090s will be out of warranty long before any surface scratches on the PCB ever matter. It's good that the contact fingers are not being affected by that ridiculous retention mechanism the clowns at ASUS decided to make. Things like that are truly worthy of severe punitive legal action. It's sad how all of the big names in tech act first, think later and just don't care. I'm starting to grow numb to how we are getting screwed over at every turn. AMD, Intel, NVIDIA, ASUS, MSI, Gigabyte, ASRock... all of them. All shady and greed-driven self-centered entities that ultimately don't really care about the quality of their products, the people that make them or the people that purchase them. The joke is on us for thinking anything different.

 

[Svet]

Updated.

 

[lysyn12155d02d4]

Thx