MPG X870E CARBON WIFI Beta BIOS

Svet

Svet

🛠️ ⚙️⚒️
ADMIN
Joined
Nov 20, 2003
Messages
85,475
>>> E7E49AMSI.1A1E <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A1H <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A21 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A22 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A24 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A25 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A26 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A28 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A29 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A31 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A32 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A33 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A34 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A41 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A44 <<<

Notes:
  • * Unstable RAM OC
  • * Hang 0D when saving BIOS settings or doing M-Flash

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A62 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A65 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A66 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A93 <<<

>>> E7E49AMSI.1A99 <<<

.rar SHA-256: 0da3ebedfa9e1f53f3e3aa320c1fd32f770cae0b32f112fe87750f1f88031487
BIOS SHA-256: 07a227bb302e9eac43bca0e18a43cfe58e043302eebfb13b08c7b8653a8ad636



>>> E7E49AMSI.1AA1 <<<

.rar SHA-256: cf63c3ad59580532257612b108db651ec3341a517c22efb20127dd44c94d8ae1
BIOS SHA-256: 4BD52D73DE3112768E2C6C62CA85C423F0963359A4C4B1CFCFEF1C04294DE1D2

AGESA ver:
Screenshot 2026-06-06 162546.jpg


 
Last edited:
Sort by date Sort by votes
Hi @Svet, any chance you could also share a beta bios for X870E Tomahawk Wifi with Agesa 1.3.0.1 please?
I've not been able to stabilize my DDR5-8000 profile with 7E59v2AA0/7E59v2AB0, but works absolutely fine with 7E59v2A90
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
alexandru.mohor15c702e1 said:
Hello there.
Excuse me, but could someone post a quick changelog between latest stable 1A95 and latest beta 1A99? I'm interested about the memory changes and the AGESA version.
Thank you!
Click to expand...
The main jump is from AGESA 1.3.0.0 to 1.3.0.1. The 1A99 version is basically a fix for the memory issues in the previous 1A98 build, which was causing boot failures and post codes 00/02 for some of us. It feels more stable for memory training now, but keep an eye on your Auto voltages as they might run a bit higher than before. Definitely a solid update over 1A95 if you're looking for better stability
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Vendex_AMD said:
The main jump is from AGESA 1.3.0.0 to 1.3.0.1. The 1A99 version is basically a fix for the memory issues in the previous 1A98 build, which was causing boot failures and post codes 00/02 for some of us. It feels more stable for memory training now, but keep an eye on your Auto voltages as they might run a bit higher than before. Definitely a solid update over 1A95 if you're looking for better stability
Click to expand...

Thank you!
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
A99 runs without issues on my system 9850X3D 8000Kingston FuryLE I'm also able to use tighter settings and have no issues, as for autoPWR works pretty good with 9850X3D and I always under volt SOC to 1.25 as it is set to 1.3 by Bios and still have the memory stable . So overall coming from 95 to 99 I see no significant performance difference here I'm stable at Curve -25 while on 95 I could go only -20 +200 Boost. However, I see no significant difference in performance, if it doesn't run worse after update, I take it as good regardless of performance gains.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0 Downvote
DarkOmenX said:
A99 runs without issues on my system 9850X3D 8000Kingston FuryLE I'm also able to use tighter settings and have no issues, as for autoPWR works pretty good with 9850X3D and I always under volt SOC to 1.25 as it is set to 1.3 by Bios and still have the memory stable . So overall coming from 95 to 99 I see no significant performance difference here I'm stable at Curve -25 while on 95 I could go only -20 +200 Boost. However, I see no significant difference in performance, if it doesn't run worse after update, I take it as good regardless of performance gains.
Click to expand...
Great to see the 1A99 holding up so well on the 9850X3D! I'm seeing similar behavior on my end, I managed to stabilize my 9800X3D at -30 CO with this build. I'm also manually locking SOC/VDDIO at 1.25V like you, as the аuto settings are definitely a bit over-voltage. Even without a massive raw performance jump, the improved stability with tight timings and deeper undervolting makes this bios a clear winner over 1A95 for me. Cheers
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
alexandru.mohor15c702e1 said:
Hello there.
Excuse me, but could someone post a quick changelog between latest stable 1A95 and latest beta 1A99? I'm interested about the memory changes and the AGESA version.
Thank you!
Click to expand...
You'll never get a changelog here on this channel, just like SVET doesn't get one either. However, even the official release changelogs are ridiculous and most often written uselessly and poorly.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
DarkOmenX said:
You'll never get a changelog here on this channel, just like SVET doesn't get one either. However, even the official release changelogs are ridiculous and most often written uselessly and poorly.
Click to expand...
Look, we all know official changelogs suck and MSI is lazy with descriptions, but let’s not take it out on Svet. He’s just passing these betas to us so we don't have to wait weeks for a fix. These builds are for enthusiasts anyway, the real 'changelog' is what we find out ourselves by testing. Just my two cents.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Vendex_AMD said:
Look, we all know official changelogs suck and MSI is lazy with descriptions, but let’s not take it out on Svet. He’s just passing these betas to us so we don't have to wait weeks for a fix. These builds are for enthusiasts anyway, the real 'changelog' is what we find out ourselves by testing. Just my two cents.
Click to expand...
and where did I take it out on SVET ? I just stated what he said several times before he doesn't get it from the source, how is this considered "taking out" on anyone?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
DarkOmenX said:
and where did I take it out on SVET ? I just stated what he said several times before he doesn't get it from the source, how is this considered "taking out" on anyone?
Click to expand...
Fair enough, maybe I misread your tone. We’re definitely on the same page about MSI’s poor documentation, it’s frustrating for everyone. My point was just that I’m glad we have some way to get these fixes early, even if the paperwork is missing. No hard feelings!
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Vendex_AMD said:
Fair enough, maybe I misread your tone. We’re definitely on the same page about MSI’s poor documentation, it’s frustrating for everyone. My point was just that I’m glad we have some way to get these fixes early, even if the paperwork is missing. No hard feelings!
Click to expand...
Non taken I also like what SVET is doing.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I just installed A99 performance better than A95 not error 0d anymore, this morning I got odd thing cannot turn on pc with once push button to start pc, must push power button twice. Push power button first time not on, push second time the PC will boot up without any issue. The same thing happened with the previous A65. Does anyone know what's going on ?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
jankmail15af02e1 said:
I just installed A99 performance better than A95 not error 0d anymore, this morning I got odd thing cannot turn on pc with once push button to start pc, must push power button twice. Push power button first time not on, push second time the PC will boot up without any issue. The same thing happened with the previous A65. Does anyone know what's going on ?
Click to expand...
That sounds like a classic cold boot issue. Since it happened on A65 too, your board is probably struggling with initial memory training or PSU power states. Try setting memory context restore and power down to enabled instead of auto, and maybe switch power supply idle control to typical current idle. It should help the board wake up on the first try
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Vendex_AMD said:
That sounds like a classic cold boot issue. Since it happened on A65 too, your board is probably struggling with initial memory training or PSU power states. Try setting memory context restore and power down to enabled instead of auto, and maybe switch power supply idle control to typical current idle. It should help the board wake up on the first try
Click to expand...
Ok thank you, I will try your suggestion to see if it boot up perfectly or not.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Back
Top