- Joined
- Oct 12, 2016
- Messages
- 25,197
Of course you would see the difference between single- and dual-channel operation, because single-channel has exactly half the memory bandwidth. So actually the CPU gets starved, because everything has to go through the RAM first. The more RAM-transfer-intensive something is, the bigger the difference.
Let's say you have dual-channel DDR4-3200 running. Then taking one module away, it would be similar to running dual-channel DDR4-1600! That's the bandwidth you get from single-channel DDR4-3200. Would you say that running 2x DDR4-1600 (if such low speeds existed) is not much different from running 2x DDR4-3200? It makes no sense.
As i said, it all depends on what you do. If everything is only loaded once via RAM and then fits into the CPU's caches: Fine. If there's a lot of RAM transfers: Catastrophy.
Let's say you have dual-channel DDR4-3200 running. Then taking one module away, it would be similar to running dual-channel DDR4-1600! That's the bandwidth you get from single-channel DDR4-3200. Would you say that running 2x DDR4-1600 (if such low speeds existed) is not much different from running 2x DDR4-3200? It makes no sense.
As i said, it all depends on what you do. If everything is only loaded once via RAM and then fits into the CPU's caches: Fine. If there's a lot of RAM transfers: Catastrophy.