glenntidbur156f02e4
New member
- Joined
- May 16, 2022
- Messages
- 2
Just wondering, when the spec page gives info for how fast you can run your ram, depending on how many sticks you're using......is it actually potentially still ok to run above that number?
Basically, I have the pro z690 A DDR5 mobo, and just upgraded my RAM to 2x16GB G.Skill 6400Mhz CL32 kit.
Because I'm running 2 sticks, the spec page says 5400+Mhz.
at 5400Mhz, I'm finding that I can use CL26 timings, giving a latency according to the calculator of 9.62962962 ns.
I can push it up to 5800Mhz with CL28 timings, and it seems stable so far, and gives slightly higher latency of 9.65517241 ns.
Given that both these options appear stable so far, which should I choose?
Is the extra 400Mhz worth it, or should you generally choose the lowest latency you can?
Is it worth it to go slightly above the recommended 5400Mhz for this board? or will that likely produce instability eventually?
Also, is there likely to be any updates going forward to improve stability at higher speeds with more than 1 stick of ram?
Basically, I have the pro z690 A DDR5 mobo, and just upgraded my RAM to 2x16GB G.Skill 6400Mhz CL32 kit.
Because I'm running 2 sticks, the spec page says 5400+Mhz.
at 5400Mhz, I'm finding that I can use CL26 timings, giving a latency according to the calculator of 9.62962962 ns.
I can push it up to 5800Mhz with CL28 timings, and it seems stable so far, and gives slightly higher latency of 9.65517241 ns.
Given that both these options appear stable so far, which should I choose?
Is the extra 400Mhz worth it, or should you generally choose the lowest latency you can?
Is it worth it to go slightly above the recommended 5400Mhz for this board? or will that likely produce instability eventually?
Also, is there likely to be any updates going forward to improve stability at higher speeds with more than 1 stick of ram?